Posted by Dr. Anthony ADRIAN
November 18, 2009 -
1,202 views
Religion is also responsible for massive tolls of death and suffering from a wholly different perspective: holding back scientific progress, when it felt that such progress threatened the religion's authority in some way. In other words, humanity would likely have far more scientific knowledge and better technology than it does today, if organized religion had never existed-- and so might have already eliminated poverty and sickness by now. Because we'd be at minimum more technologically advanced by centuries over what we are today. That makes for literally billions of people who've needlessly died and suffered in past centuries, and/or the next 100-200 years. You yourself will almost certainly end up being yet another person who dies or suffers unnecessarily-- where in an alternate timeline without religion, you might not even be familiar with the terms death and suffering, as they'd be so rare by this point.
If I care about you and the rest of the family, how could I possibly like organized religion in the face of all this? They've robbed us all of our best destinies.
Around 1584 Italian monk Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake because he made the statement below and would not take it back:
"Countless suns exist; countless earths revolve around these suns in a manner similar to the way the planets revolve around our sun. Living beings inhabit these worlds."
The (today) much more famous and celebrated Galileo came perilously close to the same fate himself, merely for insisting that the Earth orbited the Sun rather than the other way around. After he finally took it back under threat, he spent the rest of his life as a prisoner of the church.
The church basically used terrorism to suppress scientific experimentation and innovation for many centuries-- except where it helped along torture and mass killings.
That's part of the reason today's militaries are so darn good at killing people; military tech has always been nurtured by those in power.
Still being young though, I realize you may not know much about the history of religion, or even care. That's how most young people are. I was too at your age. But over time many people decide this stuff is more important than they originally thought.
You do realize don't you that someone can be religious, but just be against organized religion, right? The question of whether God exists or not can be a separate issue from which particular religion you subscribe to; some religions (especially those which preceded the monotheist religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in history) held forth that there were multiple Gods rather than merely one.
You're also equating my phrase about religion's slowing of progress with your own personal mental state, when I'm speaking of organized religion itself, the institution. The one responsible for the torturing and executions and holding back of scientific progress over the centuries, mostly long before even your great grandparents were born. How you could hold yourself responsible for that mystifies me-- but perhaps you didn't know about the church's history, and that gap caused you to make the conceptual leap.
As for spending your time defending organized religion, you might want to more closely examine both its present and its past before committing yourself to that course.
You can be religious without being a pawn of organized religion or corrupt evangelists. Lots of people live that way, and so are less troubled when they hear of the latest crimes by the organized religion set, since they are not themselves participants in or defenders of such groups or their leaders.
Peace
I became a minister to teach many out there that life is precious and the importance to know history which is the continuum of events occurring in succession leading from the past to the present and eve... more
Remember also that some fine wine can turn to vinegar, old cheese generally stinks and we need to have less stress a... more